Thrive Game Development
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Thrive Game Development

Development of the evolution game Thrive.
 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Welcome new and returning members!
If you're new, read around a bit before you post: the odds are we've already covered your suggestion.
If you want to join the development team, sign up and tell us why.
ADMIN is pleased to note that this marquee has finally been updated.
ADMIN reminds you that the Devblog is REQUIRED reading.
Currently: The Microbe Stage GUI is under heavy development
Log in
Username:
Password:
Log in automatically: 
:: I forgot my password
Quick Links
Website
/r/thrive
GitHub
FAQs
Wiki
New Posts
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Statistics
We have 1675 registered users
The newest registered user is dejo123

Our users have posted a total of 30851 messages in 1411 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 6 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 6 Guests

None

Most users ever online was 443 on Sun Mar 17, 2013 5:41 pm
Latest topics
» THIS FORUM IS NOW OBSOLETE
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby NickTheNick Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:26 pm

» To all the people who come here looking for thrive.
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby NickTheNick Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:22 pm

» Build Error Code::Blocks / CMake
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby crovea Tue Jul 28, 2015 5:28 pm

» Hello! I can translate in japanese
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby tjwhale Thu Jul 02, 2015 7:23 pm

» On Leave (Offline thread)
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby NickTheNick Wed Jul 01, 2015 12:20 am

» Devblog #14: A Brave New Forum
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby NickTheNick Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:49 am

» Application for Programmer
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby crovea Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:14 am

» Re-Reapplication
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby The Creator Thu Jun 25, 2015 10:57 pm

» Application (programming)
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby crovea Tue Jun 23, 2015 8:00 am

» Achieving Sapience
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby MitochondriaBox Sun Jun 21, 2015 7:03 pm

» Microbe Stage GDD
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby tjwhale Sat Jun 20, 2015 3:44 pm

» Application for Programmer/ Theorist
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby tjwhale Wed Jun 17, 2015 9:56 am

» Application for a 3D Modeler.
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby Kaiju4u Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:16 am

» Presentation
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby Othithu Tue Jun 02, 2015 10:38 am

» Application of Sorts
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby crovea Sun May 31, 2015 5:06 pm

» want to contribute
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby Renzope Sun May 31, 2015 12:58 pm

» Music List Thread (Post New Themes Here)
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby Oliveriver Thu May 28, 2015 1:06 pm

» Application: English-Spanish translator
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby Renzope Tue May 26, 2015 1:53 pm

» Want to be promoter or project manager
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby TheBudderBros Sun May 24, 2015 9:00 pm

» A new round of Forum Revamps!
Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Emptyby Oliveriver Wed May 20, 2015 11:32 am


 

 Function Part Discussion

Go down 
+14
penumbra espinosa
Jimexmore
Aiosian_Doctor_Xenox
Thriving Cheese
FunnyGames
Holomanga
untrustedlife
Raptorstorm
WilliamstheJohn
Sundu
US_of_Alaska
Daniferrito
NickTheNick
Tarpy
18 posters
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 9 ... 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
AuthorMessage
Inca
Regular
Inca


Posts : 250
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2013-07-03
Age : 30
Location : England

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyMon Jul 29, 2013 7:11 pm

The more I think about this, the more I think we just have buildings at the same size, so all houses will be more or less the same size.
Back to top Go down
http://soundcloud.com/inca_uk
NickTheNick
Overall Team Co-Lead
NickTheNick


Posts : 2312
Reputation : 175
Join date : 2012-07-22
Age : 28
Location : Canada

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyMon Jul 29, 2013 7:20 pm

Same conclusion I came to.
Back to top Go down
Inca
Regular
Inca


Posts : 250
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2013-07-03
Age : 30
Location : England

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyMon Jul 29, 2013 7:31 pm

Can we confirm that then? I don't really see a viable alternative anyway.
Back to top Go down
http://soundcloud.com/inca_uk
NickTheNick
Overall Team Co-Lead
NickTheNick


Posts : 2312
Reputation : 175
Join date : 2012-07-22
Age : 28
Location : Canada

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyMon Jul 29, 2013 9:14 pm

Well I would like to see what Tarpy thinks, as he is quite a useful member for our Strategy team.
Back to top Go down
Tarpy
Strategy Team Lead
Tarpy


Posts : 337
Reputation : 23
Join date : 2013-03-08
Location : Here

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyTue Jul 30, 2013 11:21 am

I can see the problems with different sizes now, since I was wrong when I first thought that only houses need to be equal to or larger in size. As you said, smaller creatures can still use stuff like libraries, theatres etc since really they would only need to tweak the interior a little bit but not casting plants, smithies etc since they would be too small to operate the machinery.

That's not the only problem. If houses had different sizes, and we went for the hitpoint system discussed in the build rates thread, than there would be no difference in health between a building of a very small creature and the completely same, but much larger version of the building of a larger creature.

Although it might not be as interesting or realistic as with non-constant sizes, I agree we should take the standard size approach. If I had to choose between less realism and less player comfort, in this case I would choose less realism.

So, standard size is 3*3*2 m, as you said, right?
Back to top Go down
NickTheNick
Overall Team Co-Lead
NickTheNick


Posts : 2312
Reputation : 175
Join date : 2012-07-22
Age : 28
Location : Canada

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyTue Jul 30, 2013 4:35 pm

Yes, that's the right size.
Back to top Go down
Tarpy
Strategy Team Lead
Tarpy


Posts : 337
Reputation : 23
Join date : 2013-03-08
Location : Here

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyTue Jul 30, 2013 4:37 pm

So, is there anything else on the housing FP?
Back to top Go down
NickTheNick
Overall Team Co-Lead
NickTheNick


Posts : 2312
Reputation : 175
Join date : 2012-07-22
Age : 28
Location : Canada

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyTue Jul 30, 2013 4:59 pm

That's all I got, just a boost to pop cap per additional volume past the minimum dimensions.
Back to top Go down
Tarpy
Strategy Team Lead
Tarpy


Posts : 337
Reputation : 23
Join date : 2013-03-08
Location : Here

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyWed Jul 31, 2013 5:53 am

So, that's it for the housing I guess. Which FP should we discuss next?
Back to top Go down
WilliamstheJohn
Regular
WilliamstheJohn


Posts : 409
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2012-12-26
Age : 31
Location : Third Rock from Sol

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyWed Jul 31, 2013 9:17 am

Tools: Scout Pack
Machinery: Oars
Structures: Crafting hut
Networking: Wall

I think oars are most important. Heres a idea how they could work: Researching Oars should boost speed of boats by 20%
Back to top Go down
Tarpy
Strategy Team Lead
Tarpy


Posts : 337
Reputation : 23
Join date : 2013-03-08
Location : Here

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyWed Jul 31, 2013 9:54 am

Well, if the ship doesn't have sails or oars it won't be able to move at all.

Oars must be operated (although this doesn't really matter, we'll just assume that there are enough people on the ship to operate it), and depending on the strength of your creatures and the mass of your ship, will increase the speed (not by a percent, but by a number)

Sails would just need winds to move, although if you only had sails, you would have very little control of your ship. Now, I don't know how wind would work, or if it would be implemented at all, but sails would also give a bonus to speed, depending on wind speeds and the mass of the ship.

It would perhaps be easier if we took an example. Say, a trireme. I have gathered some info on them (average and max speed, number of oars and people operating them and the amount of sails).

It could go the speed of 11.5 knots (6 m/s), although average speed was 7.37 knots (3.8 m/s). They had about 170 oarsmen and oars, and 2 triangular sails (I think).

If someone could find me the mass/dimensions (which I could not find at all), maybe we could try and develop some kind of formula using this as an example.
Back to top Go down
Inca
Regular
Inca


Posts : 250
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2013-07-03
Age : 30
Location : England

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyWed Jul 31, 2013 10:04 am

I think oars would be included when boats are unlocked, and then have sails as a further upgrade. Though I can't see wind being implemented really, so I say sails just boost the speed regardless of wind direction (because there won't be any).

We could have rudder as an upgrade to improve turning speed?
Back to top Go down
http://soundcloud.com/inca_uk
Tarpy
Strategy Team Lead
Tarpy


Posts : 337
Reputation : 23
Join date : 2013-03-08
Location : Here

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyWed Jul 31, 2013 1:27 pm

Inca wrote:
I think oars would be included when boats are unlocked, and then have sails as a further upgrade. Though I can't see wind being implemented really, so I say sails just boost the speed regardless of wind direction (because there won't be any).

We could have rudder as an upgrade to improve turning speed?

 Here is a link to the tech editor wiki page, you can check out the full table of function part technological pre-requests. Oars are unlocked with the discovery of boating, so as soon as you start making boats, you'll already have oars available.

As you said, sails should just give a speed boost, while rudders would make the ship much more agile.

But we are getting ahead of ourselves, we should be discussing oars.

So, we need a formula how 1 oar would affect your speed? Anyone have an idea?
Back to top Go down
Inca
Regular
Inca


Posts : 250
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2013-07-03
Age : 30
Location : England

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyWed Jul 31, 2013 1:46 pm

Ah ok.

Erm, well a trireme has about 130 oars and can go at about 17km/h, so 1 oar has a speed of 130m/h roughly. But trireme's are built for speed, so we might want to lower it or find another ship to measure against to find a good average.
Back to top Go down
http://soundcloud.com/inca_uk
NickTheNick
Overall Team Co-Lead
NickTheNick


Posts : 2312
Reputation : 175
Join date : 2012-07-22
Age : 28
Location : Canada

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyThu Aug 01, 2013 12:39 am

After doing some calculating, I got 100 N of force exerted by a humanoid with one oar. Since organisms with more muscles will have more mass, I don't think we need to factor in strength, so i think we could just leave it at that.

An oar exerts 100N of force perpendicular to the direction of placement. (We can ignore the unbalanced oars causing turning issue)
Back to top Go down
WilliamstheJohn
Regular
WilliamstheJohn


Posts : 409
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2012-12-26
Age : 31
Location : Third Rock from Sol

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyThu Aug 01, 2013 6:16 am

Tarpy wrote:
Well, if the ship doesn't have sails or oars it won't be able to move at all.

Ships wont be able to move without oars, they are to heavy, but small boats (Example: Fishing boats), can be, if players creature has anough strenght to do that, be moved using hands as oars. But that would be very slow.
Back to top Go down
Tarpy
Strategy Team Lead
Tarpy


Posts : 337
Reputation : 23
Join date : 2013-03-08
Location : Here

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyThu Aug 01, 2013 7:15 am

NickTheNick wrote:
After doing some calculating, I got 100 N of force exerted by a humanoid with one oar. Since organisms with more muscles will have more mass, I don't think we need to factor in strength, so i think we could just leave it at that.

An oar exerts 100N of force perpendicular to the direction of placement. (We can ignore the unbalanced oars causing turning issue)

Sounds good to me
Back to top Go down
NickTheNick
Overall Team Co-Lead
NickTheNick


Posts : 2312
Reputation : 175
Join date : 2012-07-22
Age : 28
Location : Canada

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyFri Aug 02, 2013 6:33 pm

WilliamstheJohn wrote:
Ships wont be able to move without oars, they are to heavy, but small boats (Example: Fishing boats), can be, if players creature has anough strenght to do that, be moved using hands as oars. But that would be very slow.

Actually, ships with sails can move without oars. It was how Columbus reached the New World. However, oars would only be effective in shallow/calm waters. In deeper and stormier water, oars are useless.

Also, we need to think of a way of making the players not be able to traverse oceans right away, so that they could end up getting "New World" experiences as happened on Earth.
Back to top Go down
Inca
Regular
Inca


Posts : 250
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2013-07-03
Age : 30
Location : England

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyFri Aug 02, 2013 6:43 pm

Why don't we just make the seas too hard to traverse. Then when your boat tech is up to a level, we basically just unlock it and let them cross.
Back to top Go down
http://soundcloud.com/inca_uk
NickTheNick
Overall Team Co-Lead
NickTheNick


Posts : 2312
Reputation : 175
Join date : 2012-07-22
Age : 28
Location : Canada

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyFri Aug 02, 2013 7:03 pm

But what depth would we mark off as too deep?
Back to top Go down
Inca
Regular
Inca


Posts : 250
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2013-07-03
Age : 30
Location : England

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyFri Aug 02, 2013 7:22 pm

Erm just like a few hundred meters out to sea or something, I really don't know
Back to top Go down
http://soundcloud.com/inca_uk
Aiosian_Doctor_Xenox
Learner
Aiosian_Doctor_Xenox


Posts : 196
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2013-05-27
Age : 34
Location : Kent

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyFri Aug 02, 2013 8:22 pm

So, um, just a quick question, on what I saw on the new wiki, what exactly does the 'spy gear' entail? And does it include listening devices/bugs?
Back to top Go down
http://s15.zetaboards.com/Xeno_Corporation/index/
NickTheNick
Overall Team Co-Lead
NickTheNick


Posts : 2312
Reputation : 175
Join date : 2012-07-22
Age : 28
Location : Canada

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptyFri Aug 02, 2013 8:27 pm

To discuss what it does is jumping wayy ahead of ourselves. However, my concepts for it are that it would maybe extent LoS and give the unit partial concealment. It actually happens to be one of the few FP's I cannot specifically remember as to why I included it.
Back to top Go down
WilliamstheJohn
Regular
WilliamstheJohn


Posts : 409
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2012-12-26
Age : 31
Location : Third Rock from Sol

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptySat Aug 03, 2013 2:36 am

Inca wrote:
Why don't we just make the seas too hard to traverse. Then when your boat tech is up to a level, we basically just unlock it and let them cross.

Diseases, lack of food on ship, storms.
Back to top Go down
Silver Sterling
Newcomer
Silver Sterling


Posts : 96
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2012-08-24
Age : 43
Location : Germaney

Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 EmptySat Aug 03, 2013 9:43 am

Navigation aswell. In the first stages there would be only navigation near coasts, because you woudn't know how to sail with the help of the sun and/or the stars and/or a compass. After some time, you have to learn new navigation methodes, to travel the seas.

In the direct control mode, i could imagine, that you can go out, but wouldn't see any information about the directions, so would be completly clueless in what direction you drive. And by a realistic boat simulation, you wouldn't drive a straight line even if you don't steer.

For the strategic mode there are some more question, how to do it:
1. Possible would be a limited control and visible range depending on your technology. (Donno if something like this has already be suggested.)
a. One way would be, that the unit returns into control area automaticly, if it can, after it did the job it was ordered.
b. Possible you could take control over the unit directly even if its outside your range and if you manage to get it back then, you would be able to control it in strategic mode again.
2. Your unit can't exit the coast range.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Function Part Discussion   Function Part Discussion - Page 15 Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Function Part Discussion
Back to top 
Page 15 of 17Go to page : Previous  1 ... 9 ... 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Concept Race
» [ARC]-Roadkill's programming tutorial part I-
» [ARC] Menu Discussion
» Agents Discussion
» Strategy Mode Discussion

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Thrive Game Development :: Development :: Design :: Modes :: Strategy-
Jump to: