Concept Art Thread

Gotrol wrote:

Creepy? Dont know, I tried to get in between insects and mammals sort of thing =)

Anyhow, I just quickly bogged down and idea of an "extended" spaceport... very much WIP but Im planning to do a big all out picture.

Question is should I move the spaceport away from the horizon into the picture, or should I leave is as it is and populate the space before with small buildings?

http://gotrol.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d31ma8q

Your call, Im stuck.

Yeah. It does look empty, I'd go for either option, each one is suitably epic.

Gotrol wrote:

Creepy? Dont know, I tried to get in between insects and mammals sort of thing =)

Anyhow, I just quickly bogged down and idea of an "extended" spaceport... very much WIP but Im planning to do a big all out picture.

Question is should I move the spaceport away from the horizon into the picture, or should I leave is as it is and populate the space before with small buildings?

http://gotrol.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d31ma8q

Your call, Im stuck.

I'd say you should add more small buildings, I guess they should be styled to a sort-of alien space market. I dunno, I'm no artist.

AssassinBlue wrote:

Gotrol wrote:

Creepy? Dont know, I tried to get in between insects and mammals sort of thing =)

Anyhow, I just quickly bogged down and idea of an "extended" spaceport... very much WIP but Im planning to do a big all out picture.

Question is should I move the spaceport away from the horizon into the picture, or should I leave is as it is and populate the space before with small buildings?

http://gotrol.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d31ma8q

Your call, Im stuck.

I'd say you should add more small buildings, I guess they should be styled to a sort-of alien space market. I dunno, I'm no artist.

QFT

Pezzalis wrote:

So you mean just the water w/o creatures, shadows, or logos?

(On assumption)
Sure thing




~And here is my celebration of 100 posts~


Also as a celebratory action on this occasion, I may make myself a Thrive Sig
=]

You sir, are officially on my good side.

Tenebrarum wrote:

AssassinBlue wrote:

Gotrol wrote:

Creepy? Dont know, I tried to get in between insects and mammals sort of thing =)

Anyhow, I just quickly bogged down and idea of an "extended" spaceport... very much WIP but Im planning to do a big all out picture.

Question is should I move the spaceport away from the horizon into the picture, or should I leave is as it is and populate the space before with small buildings?

http://gotrol.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d31ma8q

Your call, Im stuck.

I'd say you should add more small buildings, I guess they should be styled to a sort-of alien space market. I dunno, I'm no artist.

QFT

Sorry erm, kinda new... whats QFT mean exactly?

~sciocont wrote:

Pezzalis wrote:

So you mean just the water w/o creatures, shadows, or logos?

(On assumption)
Sure thing




~And here is my celebration of 100 posts~


Also as a celebratory action on this occasion, I may make myself a Thrive Sig
=]

You sir, are officially on my good side.

You mean I was on your bad side D= Lol jk
NP
Show me if you come up with something

@AssasinBlue: It means "Quote for Truth" In other words "Agreed"


P.S Like the thrive sig...?

Pezzalis wrote:

~sciocont wrote:

Pezzalis wrote:

So you mean just the water w/o creatures, shadows, or logos?

(On assumption)
Sure thing




~And here is my celebration of 100 posts~


Also as a celebratory action on this occasion, I may make myself a Thrive Sig
=]

You sir, are officially on my good side.

You mean I was on your bad side D= Lol jk
NP
Show me if you come up with something

@AssasinBlue: It means "Quote for Truth" In other words "Agreed"


P.S Like the thrive sig...?

Danks, and if anyone comes up with concept art on an entire ecosystem, plz tell me. I would love to see what one might look like on an alien planet.

New RG logo mock-up

~sciocont wrote:

New RG logo mock-up

I quite like the current one.

~sciocont wrote:

New RG logo mock-up
*snip*

I don't see the R. I can only see the lowercase G.

Edit: Nevermind, I see the R.

Tenebrarum wrote:

~sciocont wrote:

New RG logo mock-up

I quite like the current one.

I like it too, but alaska doesn't and i do think it could be simpler

I do like the new one

It relates to the name to - Revolutionary - and the logo revolves around itself. Its nice and simple too

True. A revolution, after all, is a turn-around. A whole turn, a turn-over, I like the new logo idea. It is simple, and could be thrown on and around places easily without getting ott. I'm happy either way, but this does seem nicer.
-Waap.

I'm sorry Scio, but I don't like this one much. The current one isn't perfect, but it's way better.

~sciocont wrote:

New RG logo mock-up
[snip'd]

Why is it I imagine this logo more fitting in the late-ish 90s, or for a sports shoe company? Like, if Sketchers was called "RG".

I think it's because it's mostly angular, with some curves. Also it's hard to define the letters embedded in its design. It's easy to recgonize the G, but the R didn't come for me for a while. To be honest, I actually like the current logo. A teeny tiny bit generic but at least it's not so simple, it takes 15 seconds to regonize the second letter it's supposed to represent. You know you're taking 'simpler' way too literally when that happens.

We may have to toy with this, however. It's just a concept, anyway.

I like this new one. Reminds me of a galaxy.

caekdaemon wrote:

I like this new one. Reminds me of a galaxy.

I think it looks like a safety pin.

I think this one could become better than the current one if you toy with it. But right now, as everyone is saying, it's too hard to discern the letters. I think you might have gone a little too simple? Maybe a compromise logo is needed?

US_of_Alaska wrote:

I think this one could become better than the current one if you toy with it. But right now, as everyone is saying, it's too hard to discern the letters. I think you might have gone a little too simple? Maybe a compromise logo is needed?

Perhaps. I'm quite fond of the stylized fist myself. Perhaps we could superimpose the two, along with some tweaking?

Noitulove wrote:

Why is it I imagine this logo more fitting in the late-ish 90s, or for a sports shoe company? Like, if Sketchers was called "RG".

QFT

MMM, the other one was more complicated thats right, I, conceptually, like this one more.... but maybe make it a little more symmetrical? I mean you have a ll sliding to one side, why not straighten it out? Also a little hard to see letters.

PS, I can try brainstorming on it, but only if you approve. This is your work afterall.

I quite like it, although to simple for me.

I've been staring at it for a bit and I can't seem to see the R of RG...

Can I just get this straight here... Is this the r and g? (r in red, g in blue) (I just made this quickly, the quality of the fill is terrible)



Maybe they should be different colours like this, but better colours, fading from one to the other at the join?

The Uteen wrote:

Can I just get this straight here... Is this the r and g? (r in red, g in blue) (I just made this quickly, the quality of the fill is terrible)



Maybe they should be different colours like this, but better colours, fading from one to the other at the join?

Or just separated by a small gap.

Albalrogue wrote:

The Uteen wrote:

Can I just get this straight here... Is this the r and g? (r in red, g in blue) (I just made this quickly, the quality of the fill is terrible)



Maybe they should be different colours like this, but better colours, fading from one to the other at the join?

Or just separated by a small gap.

Can I make a poll thread for either gap or fading colours? I can't really make up my mind, and I think other people will have varied opinions...


Possible votes:

Fading colours to join r and g
Small gap
Leave as is
Different logo

Yes, make a poll thread. I'll vote.
-Waap.